"I am somehow less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops."

Stephen Jay Gould (via feministpizza)

NICE

(via nodamncatnodamncradle)

(Source: peapodkid, via daughterofassata)

Ta-Nehisi Coates on “The Good, Racist People”

From his great piece in the NYT:

In modern America we believe racism to be the property of the uniquely villainous and morally deformed, the ideology of trolls, gorgons and orcs. We believe this even when we are actually being racist.

He expands in The Atlantic

The “I’m not racist even though I’m doing something actually racist right now” rationale is linked to the notion of racism as something worthy of societal condemnation. That is a good thing. As Sugrue identifies in his book, you see a post-World-War-II consensus forming in the 1950s that racial discrimination actually is wrong. 
Along with that (perhaps in the 60s) comes the idea that racism is something that “low-class” white people do. It’s not a system of laws and policies, so much as the ideology of Cletus the slack-jawed yokel. But Arnold Hirsch and Beryl Satter’s work shows the University of Chicago quietly and privately pursuing a racist strategy of “urban renewal” while publicly claiming otherwise. 

The problem with this, as Coates suggests, is that when we think of racism as something that only evil people do, we excuse, ignore or miss much of the racism at work in contemporary society. This understanding of racism allows people to ignore (and thus makes it extremely difficult for racial justice advocates to call out) racism implicit in government policies, racism at work in admired organizations (Universities and law enforcement are two good examples) and racism among otherwise “good,” well-intentioned people (many of whom might describe themselves as allies in the fight for racial justice). And we can’t move forward until we can all recognize and deal with these must less explicit, but still quite pervasive forms of racism. A similar argument could be made for other social movements that have had major successes followed by backlash and retrenchment (not surprisingly feminism comes to mind). 

 

Soraya Chemaly highlights some very reliable research suggesting that rape is, for many Syrian refugees, their primary reason for leaving the country. Despite this, US news has largely ignored the issue of rape in the refugee crisis. In addition: 

The failure to consider these realities in our assessment and our reporting is also reflected in peace-building efforts. As it is, there is a “near total absence of women from official peacekeeping,”  post-conflict transitional governments, and definitions of “peace” that are informed by women’s experiences and lives. This is a situation that results in flawed, limited and ineffective solutions – solutions that do not address how “peace” might be differently defined for girls and women.

"I hear the diversity criticism. However, to suggest that “Girls” — a show whose charm lies in part in its documentary-like feel — presents the universe these young women inhabit, working in publishing and the arts, as rich in racial diversity, would be, sadly, to lie. Besides, did anyone ever kvetch about Jerry Seinfeld’s lack of Asian friends?"

Elissa Schappel, in the articulately-titled Salon.com article, Stop dumping on Lena Dunham!

So there you have it. Let’s be real, guys! People of color do not work in the multi-faceted fields of publishing or “the arts.” Nope. No Asians, no Blacks, no Latin@s. That would be unrealistic. But you’ll see some diversity — lots of people with old British ancestry, Swedish ancestry, Nordic ancestry, even French! Right?

BTW. Many people have “kvetched” over the absence of diversity in Seinfeld. But clearly, some white ears don’t hear voices of color.

(via sumney)

“Girls” has been the target of ageism and sexism, and that isn’t right. Even so, it is not the first show to receive criticism over lack of diversity. It’s not due to sexism or ageism that the show is being called out…”Girls” is being called out due to stereotypic depictions of characters of color, the writing staff’s blasé response to concerns about diversity, and for insisting that it is novel and different and creating spaces and representing women who don’t have a place or voice, even as it continues to marginalize intersectionally.

(via racebending)

Anti-girl all day everyday #forlyfe

(via newwavefeminism)

I completely agree that the lack of racial diversity on tv is a problem but I feel like the Girls backlash isn’t doing much to fix this. It might be making it more difficult for shows/producers/writers etc. to ignore diversity/intersectionality, though Girls did quite well before making an effort to address these problems. 

Why focus so much energy on Lena Dunham when we could channel at least some of that energy into petitioning HBO and other networks to support shows created/written/directed/produced by people of color? I’ve seen a ton of the former and none of the latter on tumblr thus far.

Also, when a show makes a concerted effort to respond to criticism it doesn’t make sense to me to be “anti” that show. Why (and how can we afford to) write off people who want to learn/become allies/better understand and respond to issues of diversity?

Finally, why are we focusing so much more attention on a show that fails to include people of color when there are a TON of shows out there that continue to actively depict people of color, ethnic and sexual minorities and women in terribly derogatory ways? I’ve seen maybe one post on my dashboard about race on Two Broke Girls and what feels like a million about Girls. We need to address invisibility without forgetting that (the wrong kind of) visibility can just as problematic.

(via newwavefeminism)

Tags: Race girls hbo

Melissa Harris Perry, “How black hair matters” 

"Whilst many naturals I’ve met are happy to be part of a movement, almost none I’ve encountered consider it political…But in a post-racial America this quiet internal shift towards self-acceptance is, to my mind, the most potent and political act of all."

— Zina Saro-Wiwa in her NYT Op-Doc, “Black Women’s Transitions to Natural Hair” 

As the shooting death of Trayvon Martin continues to draw national attention, today we look at another controversial shooting of an African-American male that has received far less scrutiny. On the morning of November 19th, a 68-year-old former marine named Kenneth Chamberlain with a heart condition accidentally pressed the button on his medical alert system while sleeping. Responding to the alert, police officers from the city of White Plains, New York, arrived at Chamberlain’s apartment in a public housing complex shortly after 5 a.m. By the time the police left the apartment, Kenneth Chamberlain was dead, shot twice in the chest by a police officer inside his home. Police gained entry to Chamberlain’s apartment only after they took his front door off its hinges. Officers first shot him with a taser, then a beanbag shotgun, and then with live ammunition.

While we’re on the subject…mammograms and racial health inequalities

from Dorothy Roberts, Fatal Invention

“White women in Chicago are slightly more likely than black women to get breast cancer, but black women are twice as likely to die from it. That is a startling statistic by itself. But what is equally as shocking is that in 1980 Chicago’s black and white breast cancer mortality rates were identical: black and white women died at the same rate.” 

Searching for an explanation, Roberts interviews Steven Whitman, director of the Sinai Urban Heath Institute. Whitman explains, 

“The improvement in the white rate began to take place just as we began to figure out how to do early detection with mammography…White women were able to take advantage of these improvements and black women were not at all. So what you have is a stunningly painful observation that in twenty-five years black women have gained nothing, not one iota, in terms of beast cancer mortality from any of our advances…every week in Chicago, a little more than two black women on average die from breast cancer just because of the disparity. It’s literally a matter of life and death.” 

What prevents black women from getting the kind of cancer care available to white women? As Dorothy Roberts and Whitman suggest, one major barrier is access to mammography.

"Even after controlling for things like prior convictions, crime severity and thinness, women with light skin received sentences that were 12 percent shorter on average than dark-skinned women. Lighter women also had their actual time served reduced by about 11 percent."

GOOD

This piece was my first exposure to slam poetry. My mind was (and still is) blown.

“I don’t wear lipstick. But my lips - stick to the ears of men so they can experience in surround sound my screams of agony with each lash of rulers, measuring tape, and scales, as if my waist-line and weight are inversely proportional to my value as a human being”

Poetry by Adriel Luis, film by Karen Lum